The Freeburg IL Midgets mascot has become a focal point of heated debate, sparking discussions about cultural sensitivity and the power of symbols in modern society. This controversial high school emblem, which has represented Freeburg High School for decades, has drawn criticism from advocacy groups and ignited passionate responses from the local community. The mascot’s name and imagery have raised questions about its appropriateness in today’s increasingly diverse and inclusive world.
At the heart of this controversy lies the Little People of America’s campaign to change the Freeburg Midgets mascot, citing its potentially offensive nature. This effort has led to a complex situation involving community pride, tradition, and the evolving understanding of respectful representation. The debate surrounding the Freeburg IL Midgets mascot is a microcosm of broader discussions about the role of school symbols, the ethics of representation, and the challenges of navigating change in long-standing institutions.
The Origin and History of Freeburg’s ‘Midgets’ Mascot
How the nickname was coined
The Freeburg High School’s “Midgets” mascot has its roots in a unique sporting event. During the 1934-35 school year, a local sports writer dubbed the basketball team “the midgets” after witnessing a particularly mismatched game. Despite its small stature with the tallest player at only five feet ten inches, the team managed to overcome its height disadvantage with fast-break tactics.
The mascot’s significance to the community
For nearly a century, the “Midgets” nickname has been a source of pride and tradition for Freeburg. The mascot represents the community’s ability to overcome challenges, as exemplified by the legendary game against Dupo. With only six players, Freeburg halved Dupo’s three-year winning streak. This underdog victory cemented the mascot’s place in local lore.
The historical context of the term ‘midget’
The term “midget” emerged in the 1800s to describe circus performers. It gained prominence in the mid-19th century after Harriet Beecher Stowe used it in her novels. P.T. Barnum further popularized the term through his circus acts. However, towards the end of the 20th century, the word began to be considered pejorative by some when referring to people with dwarfism.
The Controversy: Little People of America’s Petition
LPA’s concerns and arguments
The Little People of America (LPA) has voiced strong opposition to Freeburg High School’s “Midgets” mascot. Gary Arnold, LPA’s president, described the nickname as “derogatory, objectifying and dehumanizing”. The organization argues that the term “midget” has evolved into a negative connotation, originating from the public display of people with short stature for curiosity and sport.
The petition’s demands
LPA initiated an online petition demanding Freeburg Community High School and several other schools nationwide to drop the “Midgets” moniker. The petition emphasizes that any word creating a hostile environment for potential students has no place as a school mascot. On July 8, LPA delivered this petition to the school superintendent, Andrew Lehman.
Support for the petition
The petition has gained significant traction, with over 3,800 signatures. Megan Sabourin, a woman with dwarfism from St. Louis, expressed her hurt at the community’s lack of recognition of the term’s negative impact. The LPA argues that the mascot creates an unsafe environment and could be considered an act of bullying.
Community Response and School Board Decision
Local support for keeping the mascot
The community rallied strongly in support of retaining the “Midgets” mascot. Approximately 500 people gathered at Freeburg Community High School to urge the school board to keep the name. Supporters organized a dueling petition and Facebook page to counter the LPA’s efforts.
Arguments for tradition and pride
Many supporters emphasized the mascot’s significance as a source of tradition and pride. One resident, Mary McGraw, wore a t-shirt reading “Don’t Mess with the Midget” and stated, “We’re not here to make fun of small people”. The crowd’s enthusiastic response to the board’s decision to retain the mascot highlighted its importance to the community.
School board’s stance and future considerations
Despite the controversy, the Freeburg Community High School District 77 board decided to keep the “Midgets” mascot. Board President Dean Gauch’s announcement was met with cheers from the crowd. However, some schools with similar mascots are considering changes. Scott Lepke, superintendent of the McLaughlin School District in South Dakota, acknowledged the potential for future discussions, stating, “It’s kind of embarrassing to have that nickname. It’s not a positive”.
The Debate Over Offensive Mascots in Modern America
Recent controversies with other team names
The debate over offensive mascots has intensified in recent years, with several high-profile cases sparking national discussions. The Washington NFL team retired their controversial “Redskins” name and logo in 2020, responding to long-standing pressure from activists. Similarly, the Cleveland Indians announced they would consider changing their team name, with their manager supporting the change. These decisions reflect a growing awareness of cultural sensitivities and the impact of stereotypical representations.
Changing perceptions of language and representation
The shift in attitudes towards mascots stems from a deeper understanding of their psychological impact. Studies have shown that Native American mascots can be harmful to the mental health of Native students and increase negative stereotyping among non-Native students. These mascots often perpetuate inaccurate, historic depictions that erase the existence of contemporary Native peoples. The evolving perception of language and representation has led to increased scrutiny of seemingly positive portrayals that may still reinforce harmful stereotypes.
The role of mascots in school identity
Mascots play a crucial role in shaping school identity and fostering community spirit. They serve as symbols of unity and pride, rallying students and alumni under a common banner. However, the debate over offensive mascots has challenged schools to reconsider how they represent their values and ethos. Some institutions have successfully transitioned to new mascots that better align with their evolving identities and focus on inclusivity and academic excellence. This process often involves community discussions and education, providing valuable lessons in cultural awareness and the power of symbols in society.
Freeburg’s ‘Midgets’: Pride vs. Prejudice
Community attachment to the mascot
The Freeburg community has shown strong support for keeping their “Midgets” mascot. [Approximately 500 people](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jul/17/little-people-high-school-mascot-midgets) gathered at the high school to urge the school board to retain the name. Many view the mascot as a source of pride and tradition, with one resident wearing a t-shirt reading “Don’t Mess with the Midget”. The nickname, coined nearly a century ago by a reporter impressed by the school’s short basketball team’s performance against larger opponents, has become deeply ingrained in the town’s identity.
Concerns about bullying and discrimination
Despite community support, the Little People of America (LPA) has voiced strong opposition to the mascot. Gary Arnold, LPA’s president, described the nickname as “derogatory, objectifying and dehumanizing”. The organization argues that the term “midget” has evolved into a negative connotation and could expose students of short stature to bullying and ridicule. Rodger Jennings Jr., whose son has dwarfism, emphasized the school’s responsibility to protect children and maintain a bully-free environment.
Balancing tradition with sensitivity
The debate highlights the challenge of balancing long-standing traditions with evolving societal sensitivities. While supporters argue that the mascot is not intended to cause harm, critics point out that the term’s historical baggage still has a negative impact. The controversy reflects a broader national discussion about offensive mascots and their psychological effects on marginalized groups. Studies have shown that such mascots can harm Native American children’s self-esteem and sense of community worth, raising questions about the potential impact of the “Midgets” mascot on individuals with dwarfism.
The Broader Impact of the Freeburg Controversy
Other schools with similar mascots
The Freeburg controversy has shed light on other schools using similar mascots. The Little People of America is targeting Freeburg in hopes that schools in Iowa, Missouri, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin will also change their nicknames. Some institutions are considering changes, with Scott Lepke, superintendent of the McLaughlin School District in South Dakota, acknowledging the potential for future discussions.
Potential ripple effects of the debate
The debate has sparked discussions about the psychological impact of mascots on marginalized groups. Studies have shown that Native American mascots can harm the self-esteem of Native students and increase negative stereotyping among non-Native students. This research suggests that the use of such mascots can have far-reaching consequences beyond the immediate community, affecting academic performance and perpetuating harmful stereotypes.
Legal and ethical considerations
The controversy raises important legal and ethical questions. The Washington NFL team’s loss of a federal court battle over its trademark registration highlights the potential legal implications of using potentially offensive mascots. Ethically, the debate centers on balancing tradition with sensitivity to marginalized groups. The American Psychological Association has recommended the immediate retirement of American Indian mascots due to their harmful effects on Native American children and their potential to violate civil rights.
Understanding the Term ‘Midget’: Past and Present
Etymology and historical usage
The term “midget” originated in 1865, derived from the word “midge” meaning “small fly”. It initially referred to extremely short people with proportionate limbs. P.T. Barnum popularized the term when featuring General Tom Thumb in his circus. By 1884, it described small individuals exhibited in freak shows or circuses.
Evolution of language and societal norms
Initially, “midget” was used routinely in entertainment and even medical contexts. However, societal norms have shifted. The term is now considered derogatory, hurtful, and offensive by many in the little person community. It has become associated with circus freaks, side shows, and clowns, leading to its current negative connotation.
Current perspectives on the term
Today, “midget” is widely regarded as pejorative and dehumanizing. Preferred terms include “little person,” “person of short stature,” or “dwarf”. Despite efforts to raise awareness, the term persists due to historical inertia, lack of awareness, and continued use in media. Many advocate for its removal from common usage, including in sports classifications.
The Little People of America’s Campaign
Goals and objectives of the organization
The Little People of America (LPA) strives to improve the quality of life for individuals with dwarfism while celebrating their contributions to social diversity. The organization aims to bring solutions and global awareness to issues affecting people of short stature and their families. LPA’s campaign focuses on changing the use of the term “midget,” which they consider derogatory and potentially harmful.
Strategies for raising awareness
LPA employs various strategies to raise awareness:
- Advocacy and community outreach programs
- Promoting Dwarfism Awareness Month
- Engaging in media and press statements
- Organizing international dwarfism leadership summits
- Targeting schools with “midget” mascots to encourage change
Responses from other communities and schools
Some schools have shown a willingness to consider changing their mascots. For instance, McLaughlin School District in South Dakota acknowledged the potential for future discussions about their mascot. However, other communities, like Freeburg, have strongly resisted change, with approximately 500 people gathering to support keeping their “Midgets” mascot.
Freeburg’s Dilemma: Change or Stand Firm?
Freeburg faces a challenging decision regarding its “Midgets” mascot. The community’s strong attachment to tradition clashes with growing concerns about sensitivity. [Approximately 500 people](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jul/17/little-people-high-school-mascot-midgets) gathered to support keeping the mascot, highlighting its importance to the town’s identity. However, critics argue that the term “midget” is offensive and potentially harmful to students of short stature.
The economic implications of a mascot change are significant, with fears of reduced fundraising and alumni support. However, a study suggests that failing to phase out prejudicial mascots can negatively impact donations and students’ sense of belonging. The dilemma extends beyond Freeburg, as other schools with similar mascots grapple with potential changes.
Mascots and Identity: The Psychology of School Symbols
School mascots play a crucial role in shaping institutional identity and fostering a sense of belonging among students. These symbols personify an institution’s spirit, values, and aspirations, encapsulating its unique identity into a single, easily recognizable design. Research in social psychology shows that symbols can foster unity and create a shared identity, with mascots serving as unifying symbols in school settings.
The role of mascots in community cohesion
Mascots have a significant impact on community cohesion. They serve as visual narratives that capture the essence of the school, creating a strong connection between the institution and its stakeholders. During sporting events, mascots become banners that unite supporters, fueling enthusiasm and team spirit. This unity can enhance school pride and stimulate participation in various school activities.
Psychological attachment to long-standing traditions
The psychological attachment to mascots often stems from long-standing traditions. Students and alumni develop a strong emotional connection to these symbols over time. However, this attachment can sometimes conflict with evolving societal norms. For instance, some Native American mascots have been found to lower self-esteem and feelings of community worth among Indigenous teens and college students.
The impact of mascots on student self-image
Mascots can significantly influence student self-image and future aspirations. Studies have shown that exposure to certain mascots can decrease achievement-related future goals among affected groups. For example, Native college students exposed to Native American mascots were less likely to express desires for higher education and professional careers. This highlights the importance of carefully considering the psychological impact of mascots on all student populations.
The Ethics of Representation in School Mascots
Responsibility of educational institutions
Educational institutions have a significant responsibility in shaping students’ perceptions and fostering an inclusive environment. Research has shown that mascots and imagery in schools can have a profound impact on student self-esteem and academic performance. Stereotypical representations can contribute to issues faced by marginalized groups, including suicide, unemployment, and poverty. Schools must recognize that mascots are not trivial symbols but powerful tools that can either promote unity or perpetuate harmful stereotypes.
Balancing free speech with inclusivity
The debate over mascots often involves balancing free speech with the need for inclusivity. While some argue for preserving traditions, others emphasize the importance of creating a welcoming environment for all students. Studies have demonstrated that exposure to stereotypes can lead to stereotypical thinking about other minority groups, highlighting the broader societal impact of mascot choices. Educational institutions must carefully consider how their mascots affect the learning environment and community relations.
The role of intent vs. impact in mascot debates
In mascot debates, the intention behind a symbol often differs from its impact on marginalized communities. Even purportedly positive stereotypes can present false portrayals of cultures and hinder understanding of contemporary issues. Educators and administrators must prioritize the impact of mascots on student well-being and academic success over traditional justifications. Revising curricula to include accurate information about diverse cultures can help address these concerns and promote a more inclusive educational environment.
Navigating Change: Lessons from Other Mascot Controversies
Case studies of successful mascot changes
The Washington Football Team’s decision to remove its controversial mascot in 2020 marked a significant shift in the ongoing debate over offensive mascots. This change, along with similar actions by other professional sports teams, colleges, and schools, demonstrates a growing awareness of the need to address cultural sensitivity in branding. Great Falls College successfully introduced a new mascot, the River Otter, to solidify its brand identity and differentiate itself from other institutions.
Strategies for community engagement and consensus-building
Effective mascot changes require thorough community engagement. Great Falls College used social media, campus events, and creative marketing tactics to promote its new mascot. Some institutions have implemented trade-in or upcycle programs to ease the financial burden and increase community buy-in. Engaging in conversations about implicit bias, power, privilege, and structural racism is crucial when addressing mascot changes. Setting specific criteria for mascot selection and allowing sufficient time for each phase of the process are essential steps.
Long-term effects of mascot changes on school communities
Mascot changes can have significant impacts on school communities. Research shows that exposure to stereotypical mascots can negatively affect student self-esteem and academic performance. By eliminating offensive mascots, schools create a more inclusive environment for all students. However, it’s important to recognize the emotional attachment some community members may have to long-standing traditions. Successful mascot changes often lead to increased community pride and a stronger sense of shared identity over time.
Conclusion
The Freeburg IL Midgets mascot controversy sheds light on the ongoing struggle between tradition and evolving societal norms. This debate has an impact on not just one community but also raises broader questions about the role of mascots in shaping school identity and their potential to affect student well-being. The clash between community pride and concerns about discrimination highlights the complex nature of such issues, where there are no easy answers.
Moving forward, schools and communities grappling with similar controversies might look to this case to consider their situations. The Freeburg example underscores the need to balance respect for long-standing traditions with sensitivity towards all members of the community. In the end, these debates offer a chance to reflect on shared values and to consider how best to create inclusive environments that honor the past while embracing a more understanding future.
FAQs
What is the mascot for Freeburg known as?
The mascot for Freeburg has been known as “Marty the Midget.” This name was adopted when the current school building was established in 1929 and continued to be used into the 1960s.
Which Illinois high school uses the term ‘midgets’ for its teams?
Freeburg High School in Illinois has used the term “Midgets” as its team name since the 1934-35 school year. This name has been embraced by generations of students across various sports and activities, where it is considered a term of endearment and respect.