Russia’s alliance with Syria faces its toughest challenge since December 2024. The fall of Bashar al-Assad ended his family’s controversial five-decade rule. Russia’s naval facility in Tartous and Hmeimim air base near Latakia remain Moscow’s only military outposts beyond the former Soviet Union. These installations represent vital strategic assets that strengthen Moscow’s international influence. Syria’s new leader Ahmed al-Sharaa has taken a firm stance. He demands Assad’s return and Russian reparations to maintain these military installations. Moscow’s Deputy Foreign Minister Mikhail Bogdanov’s recent diplomatic mission to Damascus marks a significant moment. Russian officials don’t deal very well with preserving their military presence in this strategically vital region.
Russian Military Presence in Syria
Russia maintains two strategic military installations in Syria that date back to different periods. The naval facility at Tartous, a 1970s Soviet-era installation, went through major upgrades in 2012. The Hmeimim airbase, which started operations in 2015, is a vital hub that supports Russian military operations throughout the Middle East and North Africa.
These bases give Russia powerful military advantages:
- Tartous serves as Russia’s only Mediterranean repair and resupply point
- Hmeimim provides a strategic stopover for operations in Africa
- Russia secured 49-year leases for both locations in 2017
Recent satellite images show major changes at these bases. Two An-124 heavy transport aircraft stood ready at Hmeimim with raised nose cones to load equipment. The Russian forces cleared out vehicles and containers from Tartous port. Russia’s defense ministry’s shipping company, Oboronlogistika LLC, uses its vessels Sparta and Sparta II to move equipment from these locations.
Ukrainian military intelligence reports paint an interesting picture. Russian flights moved military personnel and equipment from Hmeimim to Libyan airbases at least 10 times since mid-December. The Kremlin’s Deputy Foreign Minister Mikhail Bogdanov says they haven’t made final decisions about the bases’ future. All the same, Moscow talks with Syria’s new leadership continue about keeping its presence at these strategic spots.
These installations helped Russia project its influence before recent changes. Hmeimim made air operations possible across Syria, while Tartous provided vital naval support in the Mediterranean. Russia’s regional military influence would take a big hit if it loses these facilities.
Negotiation Challenges
Syria’s new leadership has raised the stakes with Moscow by setting tough conditions for Russian military bases. Ahmed al-Sharaa, who now runs Syria, wants Russia to give up former President Bashar al-Assad and return $2 billion of Assad family’s money from Russian banks.
Money issues between the two countries go deeper. Damascus still owes Moscow $8 billion from Assad’s time in power. The Syrian government made it clear that they need “concrete measures such as compensation, reconstruction and recovery” to rebuild trust.
Russian envoy Mikhail Bogdanov went to Damascus for high-level talks, but they didn’t achieve much. Syrian leaders stood firm – they would only restore relations if Russia deals with past issues and respects their people’s wishes. Al-Sharaa has shown unexpected willingness to work with Russia, pointing to their “longstanding strategic relations” and Russia’s role in running Syria’s power plants.
Outside pressure complicates these talks. The European Union tied sanctions relief to getting foreign forces out of Syrian territory. Both sides ended up seeing the value of keeping talks going. Russia’s foreign ministry confirmed they had “frank discussions” but carefully avoided promising anything about the military bases.
Regional Power Implications
Russia’s changing military presence in Syria has deep implications for regional power dynamics. The Mediterranean is a vital arena that serves Moscow’s strategic interests and provides access to southern Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa.
Russia’s naval capabilities in the region featured a layered defense system before recent developments. This included S-400 and S-300V4 strategic surface-to-air missile systems. These assets helped support 44,000 sorties between September 2015 and November 2020.
These bases hold strategic value well beyond Syria’s borders. Moscow makes use of these installations to:
- Project power across the Mediterranean Sea
- Counter NATO’s presence in the region
- Support operations in Libya and West Africa
- Maintain logistics for the Russian Africa Corps
Russia has started exploring other basing options alongside these developments. Libya stands out as a possible alternative, with 2,000 Russian mercenary troops already based in its eastern region. Tobruk and Benghazi ports could provide safe harbor, though they face technical constraints due to limited repair facilities and berth sizes.
Military concerns are just the beginning of strategic implications. The 35-year period between 1956 and 1991 saw Syria receive military equipment worth over USD 26 billion from Moscow. This decades-old relationship shows how complex it is to maintain regional influence without established bases.
Russia might keep partial access to its Syrian installations, but its regional presence would likely weaken. This situation could lead to more focus on other locations, similar to Port Sudan, where talks continue about setting up a military maritime presence.
Conclusion
Russia’s military foothold in Syria faces a turning point. Moscow would see its Mediterranean influence weaken if it loses these bases, which would limit its power to act beyond its borders. Syria’s new leader Ahmed al-Sharaa knows how to use his position well. He uses both historical debts and Assad’s exile as powerful tools in the current talks.
Tartous and Hmeimim bases’ importance reaches way beyond Syria’s borders. Russian forces have used these locations as vital platforms to run military operations in many regions. A potential loss of these bases would push Moscow to look elsewhere, possibly expanding its presence in Libya or Sudan.
This situation emphasizes how Russia’s international military influence keeps changing. The results of these talks will without doubt shape Moscow’s future role in the Mediterranean. Russian leaders must now make tough choices as they try to keep their strategic assets while addressing Syria’s demands for both accountability and payment.
Discussion about this post